Intercon Solutions, Inc. v. Basel Action Network’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“courts routinely dismiss counterclaims that seek to generate an independent piece of litigation out of issues that are already before the court; this includes counterclaims that merely restate an affirmative defense, as well as those which simply seek the opposite effect of the complaint”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Section 525 [Washington's anti-SLAPP statute] cannot be applied by a federal court sitting in diversity because it is in direct conflict with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12 and 56.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.