State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2013
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property · In re Bonner · United States v. Montalvo-Murillo · United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. · Insurance Company v. Norton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[S]hall' imposes a mandatory requirement unless a contrary legislative intent is apparent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Marking · State v. Mayer“When restitution is ordered, the court shall determine the amount of restitution due at the sentencing hearing or within one hundred eighty days except as provided in subsection (4) of this section. The court may continue the hearing beyond the one hundred eighty days for good cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he word `shall' in a statute is presumptively imperative and operates to create a duty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Marking
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.