Holliday v. Stockman’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co. · 547 So. 2d 766 - Nichols v. Tedder · 622 So. 2d 1226 - Crow v. Crow · 688 So. 2d 1385 - Pierce v. Heritage Properties, Inc. · 559 So. 2d 1014 - Thurman v. Thurman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“¶ 13. This Court has stated: [A] father may receive credit for having paid child support where, in fact, he paid the support directly to or for the benefit of the child, where to hold otherwise would unjustly enrich the mother. This principle applies, however, only where the father proves by a preponderance of the evidence that he has, in fact, paid the support to the child under circumstances where the support money was used for the child for the purposes contemplated by the support order, that is, to provide shelter, food, clothing, and other necessities for the child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McMinn v. McMinn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.