969 So. 2d 507
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 20, 2007
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2007-11-20
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2011
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2007-11-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1concurs.
¶2I concur. Here the state charges a new law violation as the sole reason for revocation of Appellant’s probation. Since the new law violation cannot result in a conviction as a matter of law, I conclude it cannot support a violation of Appellant’s probation. See Baugh, 961 So.2d at 205.