Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 969 So. 2d 930 - Jackson v. State

969 So. 2d 930 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Smith · Jones v. United States · United States v. Gordon · Stewart v. Florida · 570 So. 2d 703 - Newsome v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘ “[t]ardy disclosure of Brady [v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963),] material is generally not reversible error unless the defendant can show that he was denied a fair trial. United States v. Gordon, 844 F.2d 1397 (9th Cir.1988); United States v. Shelton, 588 F.2d 1242 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 2822 , 61 L.Ed.2d 275 (1979); Ex parte Raines, 429 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1103 , 103 S.Ct. 1804 , 76 L.Ed.2d 368 (1983); McClain v. State, 473 So.2d 612 (Ala.Cr.App.1985). A delay in disclosing Brady material requires reversal only if ‘the lateness of the disclosure so prejudiced appellant’s preparation or presentation of his defense that he was prevented from receiving his constitutionally guaranteed fair trial.’ United States v. Shelton, 588 F.2d at 1247 (quoting United States v. Miller, 529 F.2d 1125, 1128 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 924 , 96 S.Ct. 2634 , 49 L.Ed.2d 379 (1976)).” “ ‘[Coral v. State,] 628 So.2d [954,] 980 [ (Ala.Crim.App.1992), aff'd, 628 So.2d 1004 (Ala.1993) ].’ “Ward v. State, 814 So.2d 899, 919 (Ala. Crim.App.2000).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.