Insko v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Ring v. Arizona · Hamling v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“based on practical necessity and basic fairness in the operation of a judicial system.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“If the monetary value of any violation of this subsection: 1. Is less than $20,000, the offender commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. 2. Is $20,000 or more, but less than $100,000, the offender commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. 3. Is $100,000 or more, the offender commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.