Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 969 SW2D 433 - Williams v. APS, INC.

Williams v. APS, INC.’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 2007
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 152nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co. · Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co. · Sparger v. Worley Hospital, Inc. · Brown v. Aztec Rig Equipment, Inc. · Ferguson v. Hospital Corp. International, Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) An employer shall notify each employee as provided by this section whether or not the employer has workers’ compensation insurance coverage; (b) The employer shall notify a new employee of the existence or absence of workers’ compensation insurance coverage at the time the employee is hired; (c) Each employer shall post a notice of whether the employer has workers’ compensation insurance coverage at conspicuous locations at the employer’s place of business as necessary to provide reasonable notice to the employees. The commissioner may adopt rules relating to the form and content of the notice. The employer shall revise the notice when the information contained in the notice is changed; (d) An employer who obtains workers’ compensation insurance coverage or whose coverage is terminated or canceled shall notify each employee that the coverage has been obtained, terminated, or canceled not later than the 15th day after the date on which the coverage, or the termination or cancellation of the coverage, takes effect; (e) An employer commits an administrative violation if the employer fails to comply with this section.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.