Fierro v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2013
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Liteky v. United States · Tennessee v. Middlebrooks · Cantu v. State · Rachal v. State · Garrett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Taking Fierro's statements in the context of the entire record, we conclude Fierro did not waive the alleged error [which was preserved by adverse ruling on a pretrial motion to suppress] by initially uttering in the presence of the jury that he had no objection’ to the admissibility of the videotape.”). Several other courts of appeals have recognized, albeit in unpublished opinions, that a relaxation of the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thomas, Heather
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.