State v. Olvera’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2019
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Alumax Foils, Inc. v. City of St. Louis · State Ex Rel. Davidson v. Caldwell · Benge v. Scharbauer · State ex rel. Holmes v. Dillon · State Ex Rel. Webb v. Pigg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“co-extensive with the boundaries of the state,” State v. Olvera, 969 S.W.2d 715, 716 (Mo. banc 1998), and the officeholder”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[tjhe supreme court shall have exclusive appellate jurisdiction in all cases involving ... the title to any state office.” To constitute a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Herschel v. Nixon“involving … the title to any state office.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.