Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 969 SW2D 827 - Bratcher v. Sequel Corp.

Bratcher v. Sequel Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2002
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Maroney v. Maroney · Sours v. Pierce · Rosemann v. Roto-Die Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The brief for appellant shall contain: (1) A concise statement of the grounds on which jurisdiction of the review is invoked; (2) A statement of the facts; (3) The points relied upon; and (4) An argument which shall substantially follow the order of “Points Relied on.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.