Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 969 S.W.2d 862 - Ampleman v. Schweiss

Ampleman v. Schweiss’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on City of Chesterfield v. Deshetler Homes, Inc. · State Ex Rel. State of Ill. v. Jones · Vernor v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole · Waltrip v. Davis · Siampos v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Missouri

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] dismissal without prejudice may operate to preclude a party from bringing another action for the same cause and may be res judicata of what the judgment actually decided. An appeal from a dismissal without prejudice can be taken where the dismissal has the practical effect of terminating the litigation in the form cast or in a plaintiff's chosen forum. When the effect of the order is to dismiss a plaintiff's action and not merely the pleading, then the dismissal is appealable. If the dismissal was such that refiling of the petition at that time would have been a futile act, then the order of dismissal is appealable. Applying these exceptions, dismissals without prejudice have been held appealable in such cases where the dismissal was based on statutes of limitations, theories of estoppel, a plaintiff’s lack of standing, failure of the petition to state a claim where the plaintiff chose not to plead further.... A common factor of those dismissals without prejudice found appealable was that the plaintiffs could not maintain their actions in the court where the action was filed if the reason for the dismissal was proper.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Rule 67.03. Involuntary Dismissal — Effect Thereof A defendant may move for an involuntary dismissal of the civil action for lack of jurisdiction, for prematurity of action, for failure to substitute a party for a decedent and for such other dismissals as are allowed by these Rules 41 through 101. Defendant may also move for an involuntary dismissal of the civil action for failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these Rules 41 through 101 or any order of the court. Any involuntary dismissal shall be without prejudice unless the court in its order for dismissal shall otherwise specify.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “‘In a case of a dismissal without prejudice, a plaintiff typically can cure the dismissal by filing another suit in the same court....'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.