Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 A.3d 1082 - In re M.E.

In re M.E.’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Scott S. · In re B.C. · In re Destiny T. · In re E.L. · In Re Adrian D.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is no competent record evidence that can rationally be understood to establish as more likely than not that the child was in circumstances of jeopardy to his health and welfare.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.