¶1Determination of petition held in abeyance pending a prompt hearing pursuant to section 603.3 of the Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR) to be held under the auspices of petitioner, and respondent suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof, and until the further order of this court. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Ross, Kassal and Alexander, JJ.
97 A.D.2d 372
In re Kops
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 11, 1983
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1983-10-11
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2006
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1983-10-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →