Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Ariz. 1 - State v. Gallagher

State v. Gallagher’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
6
states following
February 1981
most recently cited

2 district · 61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently February 1981 · most notably State v. Smith (1979), State v. Brierly (1973)

2 district · 61 state decisions

360196419701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Massiah v. United States · Fahy v. Connecticut · Culombe v. Connecticut

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"careful and systematic inquiry into the peculiar resilience to questioning of appellant in the light of both his physical and mental health." State v. Gallagher, 97 Ariz. 1, 7 , 396 P.2d 241, 245 (1964)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Appellant asserts error in the admission and/or display to the jury of numerous items of evidence. Illustrative of his allegations .... was the reception in evidence of a long knife and two empty scabbards found in the appel lant’s car. None of these items were properly connected to the crime in question and had nothing to do with the appellant’s guilt or innocence. They should not have been admitted or displayed. 97 Ariz. at 8 , 396 P.2d at 245 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]ny secret interrogation of the defendant, from and after the finding of the indictment, without the protection afforded by the presence of counsel, contravenes the basic dictates of fairness in the conduct of criminal causes and the fundamental rights of persons charged with crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.