Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Ariz. 61 - State v. Sheffield

State v. Sheffield’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2013

20 state decisions

100196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McNabb v. United States · Mallory v. United States · People v. Chessman · State v. Maldonado · State v. Jordan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Immediately preceding the trial, the trial judge held a hearing on this matter at which time the arresting officer and another officer testified. At the conclusion of this hearing the trial judge denied defendant’s motion to suppress. The transcript of the testimony elicited during this pretrial hearing is not before this Court. We cannot consider this alleged error where the transcript of such matter is not before us. State v. De Marinis, 92 Ariz. 225 , 375 P.2d 574 (1962). In such absence, we will presume the trial court acted on sufficient grounds and did not commit error in denying defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence. See People v. Chessman, 35 Cal.2d 455, 2 . 18 P.2d 769 , 19 A.L.R.2d 1084 (1950), cert. denied 340 U.S. 840 , 71 S.Ct. 29 , 95 L.Ed. 616 . Also see Ackerman v. Southern Arizona Bank & Trust Co., 46 Ariz. 343 , 50 P.2d 949 (1935).” 97 Ariz. at 64 , 396 P.2d at 830 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.