Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 BR 312 - In re Talley

In re Talley’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
August 1998
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 329

Relies on Woods v. City Nat Bank & Trust Co of Chicago · Brown v. Gerdes · Leiman v. Guttman · In Re Chapel Gate Apartments, Ltd. · Matter of Nu-Process Industries, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ny payment made or to be made by the proponent ... for services or for costs and expenses in or in connection with the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.