Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 BR 429 - In Re Jelinek

In Re Jelinek’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
October 2007
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2007

50198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on American Hospital Supply Corp. v. Hospital Products Ltd. · Doan v. Hudgins · Stinson v. Williamson · Lucius v. McLemore · In the Matter of Arthur Gershenbaum Appeal of Arthur Gershenbaum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To allow a debtor to amend his claim of exemption at this late date would clearly be inequitable and would hinder the diligent administration of the bankruptcy estate by the bankruptcy trustee. Because to. allow the Debtor to amend his claim of exemption at this late date would have an adverse impact on creditors whose rights have attached to the assets of the bankruptcy estate and because late amendment to the Debtor’s claim of exemptions would hinder the diligent administration of the bankruptcy estate by the Trustee, the amendment is not seasonable and, therefore, not allowed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.