In Re Rashid’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Mabey v. Official Committee of Equity Security Holders · Mullet First Bank of Colorado Springs v. Mullet · United States v. Sutton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... a debtor who lived in one unit of a thirty-unit apartment building on a quarter acre or less [could] exempt the entire building as homestead. That situation was obviously the mischief that the Oklahoma Legislature was specifically attempting to prevent in 1910 ...,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Ozey“What constitutes a “business purpose” under the Oklahoma statute presents a perplexing problem. For example, courts may have to determine whether a business purpose is unexpectedly triggered if there is mere profit-seeking activity within the home ...,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Ozey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.