¶1I concur in the judgment, and in the foregoing opinion. The amended complaint is defective, as the mortgage therein referred to is not set out in terms, or according to its legal effect, nor does the amended complaint contain any description of the property described in the mortgage. The allegation of the amended complaint as to the mortgage *305is, that a. copy of “said mortgage, with the indorsements thereon, is annexed to the original complaint herein, marked ‘Exhibit A,’ and made a part of this, complaint.” This is not sufficient. Records and papers cannot be made a part of a pleading by referring to them in this manner.
97 Cal. 296
Ralphs v. Hensler
Decided February 14, 1893
California Supreme Court · decided 1893-02-14
<p>Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial.</p> <p>The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1893-02-14
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently May 2004 · most notably Flores v. Arroyo (1961), Hale v. Farmers Insurance Exchange (1974)
2 federal appellate · 49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →