Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 CAL 532 - Gould v. Wise

Gould v. Wise’s Empirical Analysis

1893

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
6
states following
March 1984
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 1984 · most notably 74 Cal. App. 2d 312 - Peterson v. Peterson (1946), 35 Cal. App. 44 - Marks v. Reissinger (1917)

33 state decisions

1201893190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burson v. Huntington · Eyerts v. Agnes · Fitzgerald v. Goff · Harkreader v. Clayton · Henry v. Carson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Delivery is the force that vitalizes the instrument. Here there was no life in the instrument, because there was no delivery. Delivery is dependent upon the intention, the consent of the grantor, and here there was an entire absence of intention to make a delivery until the notes and mortgage were also delivered. The respective acts of the grantee and grantor as to the delivery of the deed and the securities were to be concurrent. The delivery of the deed was dependent upon the assent of the grantor, and his assent was dependent upon the performance of acts by the grantee. The grantee’s possession of the deed upon any other terms or conditions was against the assent of the grantor, and for that reason the instrument had no life. This principle is elementary.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Again, it has been repeatedly held that the fraudulent procurement of a deed deposited as an escrow from the depositary by the grantee named therein will not operate to pass title.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.