Nanos v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
1 district · 23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Erwin M. Jennings Co. v. DiGenova (1928), Louis Schlesinger Co. v. Wilson (1956)
1 district · 23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rice v. . Manley · Dung v. . Parker · Scholfield Gear & Pulley Co. v. Scholfield · Mooney v. . Elder · O'Neill v. Conway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The action is not one to enforce the contract of lease either directly or indirectly. The action is based upon facts which grew out of the making of the lease, but it is wholly collateral to it.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““If the action will not lie because this contract of lease was parol, the statute of frauds, which was intended to prevent fraud, will serve as an aid in helping to perpetrate a fraud.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.