97 Conn. 737
116 A 923
Decided February 21, 1922
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1922-02-21
Action to recover money paid for goods sold by sample and upon a warranty, and found on inspection not to conform thereto, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in Hartford County, Haines, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendants.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1948
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
No error · Decided 1922-02-21
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The appeal is confined to a correction of the finding. The first eight assignments of error do not follow our practice; the last six assignments, while not in the most approved form, cannot be said to be void assignments. We have examined the evidence and find no one of the assignments well taken, assuming all were in due form. The appeal seems to us to present no reviewable question.
¶2 There is no error.