In re Conhaim’s Empirical Analysis
97 F. 923 · 1899
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
March 1928
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 12 district ·
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where a hank holds several notes of a bankrupt, and payments hare been made within four months before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, and after the petitioner became, insolvent. and those payments have been so applied Thai one of the note's is left wholly unpaid, the hank cannot assume the position of an nnpreferred creditor as to this wholly unpaid promissory note: for the prohibition contained in section 57g is not limited to the particular debt or chose' in action on account of which a preference has been received, but it refers to creditors who have received a preference", and provides that tlie claim of such creditors shall not he allowed unless they surrender the preference received.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Gillette““‘The claims of creditors who have received preferences shall not foe allowed unless such creditors shall surrender their preferences.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Meyer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.