Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 F.2d 784 - Jacobs v. United States

Jacobs v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

97 F.2d 784 · 1938

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 1973
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1973

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

3019381940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Nichols v. Coolidge · Hassett v. Welch · Tyler v. United States · Shwab v. Doyle · Lewellyn v. Frick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““From the structure of the act to say that the measure of the tax is the extent of the interest of both joint tenants is, in effect, to say that a tax will be laid on the interest of Cornelia in respect of which Jonas had in his lifetime no longer either title or control.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.