Hadley v. Groose’s Empirical Analysis
97 F.3d 1131 · 1996
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently March 2011 · most notably United States v. Ginn (1997), Charles Adrian Foster v. Ronald Ward Wa Drew Edmondson (1999)
16 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Lockhart v. Fretwell · Scherl v. Fisher · Banks v. Privonka · Ellis v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To establish prejudice from counsel's failure to investigate a potential witness, a petitioner must show that the witness would have testified and that their testimony 'would have probably changed the outcome of the trial.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that there is a reasonable probability that but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result . . . would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[c]ounsel has a duty to make a reasonable investigation based on the information provided by a defendant, particularly when an alibi is involved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Siers v. Class
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.