Pedrina v. Han Kuk Chun’s Empirical Analysis
97 F.3d 1296 · 1996
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (2003), No. 98-56138 (2000)
18 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education · Baxter v. Palmigiano · Hansberry v. Lee · Reves v. Ernst & Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all similarly situated and their interests were given due consideration in the earlier proceedings”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc., a California Non-Profit Corporation and Membership Organization Joseph R. Abrahamson and Charlene Z. Abrahamson, as Co-Trustees of the Joseph R. Abrahamson and Charlene Z. Abrahamson Family Trust Jane S. Akdoruk Jesse Aldatz, Jr. Hugh C. Alexander Raymond D. Allen, as Trustee of the Allen 1989 Revocable Trust Gordon Alley Bruno Alpi Ernest Arnold William L. Asay Edith B. Asay Nicholas D · Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency“[m]ost of the plaintiffs in the instant action were parties to the earlier state court proceedings, and the plaintiffs have not argued that there was any lack of privity on the plaintiffs' side.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“will be found only where the interests of the non-party were adequately represented in the earlier action[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Irwin v. Mascott
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.