United States v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
97 F.3d 1360 · 1996
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Wolfgang v. Mid-America Motorsports, Inc. (1997), United States v. Clark (2005)
27 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on National Educational Support Systems, Inc. v. Autoskill, Inc. · United States v. Roederer · Griess v. Colorado · United States v. Perdomo · United States v. Lambert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all acts and omissions committed, aided, abetted, counseled, commanded, induced, procured, or willfully caused by the defendant; and ... all reasonably foreseeable acts and omissions of others in furtherance of the jointly undertaken criminal activity.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[o]ffenses that do not qualify as part of a common scheme or plan may nonetheless qualify as part of the same course of conduct....” § 1B1.3, cmt. 9(B). 4 . The relevant conduct section, U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(2), includes an offense only if three prerequisites are met: (1) the offense in question involved conduct described in §§ 1B1.3(a)(1)(A) and (B); (2) the offense would require grouping with the offense of conviction under U.S.S.G. § 3D1.2(d); and (3) the offense is part of the”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“'same course of conduct' does not require a connection between the acts in the form of an overall criminal scheme. Rather the guideline term contemplates that there be sufficient similarity and temporal proximity to reasonably suggest that repeated instances of criminal behavior constitute a pattern of criminal conduct.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.