Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

97 F.3d 1449

Docket No. 96-6528.

Smith v. Banks

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Aug. 22, 1996. Decided Sept. 4, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-09-04

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Joseph A. Boone

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-09-04

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Joseph P. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Banks, No. CA-95-562-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/97/f3d/1449 · .json · Public domain