Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

97 F.3d 1461

Docket No. 95-15278, 95-15279, 95-15347.

Unit Process Company v. Raychem Corporation Creole Engineering Sales Company

Full caption · 3 consolidated cases

  • UNIT PROCESS COMPANY, et alv.RAYCHEM CORPORATION, et al. Defendants-Appellees. CREOLE ENGINEERING SALES COMPANY, et al
  • RAYCHEM CORPORATION, et alv.UNIT PROCESS COMPANY; Brock Easley, Inc.; Bylin Heating Sust.; Fluid Flow Control Contractors, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-
  • RAYCHEM CORPORATION, Defendant, and Debenham Electrical Supply Company, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued and Submitted May 13, 1996. Decided Sept. 26, 1996.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-09-26

Relies on United States v. Carrillo-Espinoza

Decided 1996-09-26

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

¶1

Before: PREGERSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and WINMILL, District Judge.

ORDER

¶2

The judgments of the district court are AFFIRMED. Accordingly, defendant Debenham's motions to dismiss are rendered moot.

The Honorable B. Lynn Winmill, United States District Judge for the District of Idaho, sitting by designation

/97/f3d/1461 · .json · Public domain