Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 F.3d 155 - Aircraft Braking Systems Corporation v. Local International Union United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers Uaw

Aircraft Braking Systems Corporation v. Local International Union United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers Uaw’s Empirical Analysis

97 F.3d 155 · 1996

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Judith Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corporation Comprehensive Disability Protection Plan (1999), Griffith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (1998)

11 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

1601996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Montana v. United States · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · United States v. Moser

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““1) the precise issue raised in the present case must have been raised and actually litigated in the prior proceeding; 2) determination of the issue must have been necessary to the outcome of the prior proceeding; 3) the prior proceeding must have resulted in a final judgment on the merits; and 4) the party against whom estoppel is sought must have had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the prior proceeding.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.