Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 F.3d 640 - Krock v. Lipsay

Krock v. Lipsay’s Empirical Analysis

97 F.3d 640 · 1996

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 6 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Curley v. AMR Corp. (1998), Bank National Association 1997-D5 Lp v. Nomura Asset Capital Corporation 04-5488-Cv (2005)

12 federal appellate · 6 district · 8 state decisions

590199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Memphis Community School District v. Stachura · Sigmond v. United States · Voinovich v. Quilter · Neumeier v. Kuehner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'sufficiently broad' as to encompass the entire relationship between the contracting parties,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “governed by and construed in accordance with”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Under New York law, a choice-of-law provision indicating that the contract will be governed by a certain body of law does not dispositively determine that law which will govern a claim of fraud arising incident to the contract.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.