Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 F.3d 800 - Corley v. Delaney

Corley v. Delaney’s Empirical Analysis

97 F.3d 800 · 1996

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
October 2018
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Miller v. J.D. Abrams Inc. (1998), Geiger v. Kawaauhau (1997)

9 federal appellate ·

120199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stafford v. Oklahoma · State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S. · Strong v. United States · Hope v. Walker · 550 So. 2d 609 - Breland v. Schilling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]ntent to injure may be established by a showing that the debtor intentionally took action that necessarily caused, or was substantially certain to cause, the injury.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “for willfulness and malice to prevent discharge under § 523(a)(6), the debtor must have intended the actual injury that resulted”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Here, [the debtor] unquestionably acted intentionally when he loaded the shotgun, took it with him to the confrontation with [the creditor], and, with his finger on the trigger, twice tapped the barrel of the gun on the windshield of the car to get [the creditor’s] attention. In contrast, however, the firing of the gun was neither deliberate nor intentional; on the contrary, it was wholly unintentional, even though possibly not wholly unforeseeable.... [T]he injury was not “willful and malicious” on the part of [the debtor]: He neither intended the injury nor intentionally took action that was “substantially certain” to cause the injuries that [the debtor] suffered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.