Khalil v. Garland’s Empirical Analysis
2024
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Wei Guang Wang v. Board of Immigration Appeals · Romilus v. Ashcroft · Madrigal v. Holder · Topalli v. Gonzales · Myrie v. Attorney General United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“But 'to the extent that the BIA deferred to or adopted the IJ's reasoning, we review those portions of the IJ's decision' as well.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When we discuss the BIA and IJ's decisions as a unit, we refer to the BIA and IJ as 'the agency.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if a personal dispute partially motivates a persecutor's mistreatment of an applicant, record evidence can nonetheless indicate that the applicant's protected status may be another central reason for the persecution,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.