¶1 Plaintiffs in error were convicted' of the larceny of a cow. The contention made in their behalf is that there was no evidence of “taking and carrying away.” There was, however, sufficient evidence to show that the cow was butchered at the place where she was shot, and the operations necessary to prepare the beef for market. *988 almost completed, when the plaintiffs in error were discovered and ran away. The judgment of conviction is affirmed on authority of Driggers v. State, 118 So. R. 20.
97 Fla. 987
122 So 579
Davis v. State
Decided May 27, 1929
Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1929-05-27
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1929-05-27
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1963
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →