McNichols v. Loeb Rhoades & Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably Kirkpatrick v. J.C. Bradford & Co. (1987), Riordan v. Barney (1986)
2 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. · Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where it is predictable that a major focus of the litigation will be on an arguable defense unique to the named plaintiff or a small subclass.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“unique, arguable and likely to usurp a significant portion of the litigant's time and energy”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.