United States v. Yucel’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 844
Relies on Hamling v. United States · Kolender v. Lawson · Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville · Smith v. Goguen · United States v. Lanier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the system no longer operates as it did when it first came into the owner’s possession and has an unwanted characteristic”); Trademotion, LLC v. Marketcliq, Inc., 857 F.Supp.2d 1285 , 1292 (M.D. Fla. 2012) (stating that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“widespread agreement in the case law” that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.