Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Ga. App. 235 - Washington v. Kemp

97 Ga. App. 235 - Washington v. Kemp’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably State v. Arena (1963), 118 Ga. App. 11 - Mullis v. Chaika (1968)

8 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

1301958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Grier · Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Smith · 30 Ga. App. 497 - Davis v. Whitcomb · Williams v. Grier · 61 Ga. App. 780 - Callahan v. Cofield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in all cases where the minds of reasonable persons may disagree as to whether an act alleged to be negligent is in fact negligence, as well as in all cases where reasonable minds may disagree as to whether the negligence alleged concurred with the negligent acts of third persons as a proximate cause, there questions should go to a jury for decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hether [Baggett] did, [could] or should have discovered and avoided [resident appellees’] negligence before the collision became inevitable is a question for jury determination . . .” Washington, supra, p. 239 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.