State v. Keomany’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[T]he defendant has the burden of establishing ineffective assistance of counsel and must meet the following two-part test: 1) that there were specific errors or omissions reflecting counsel's lack of skill, judgment, or diligence; and 2) that such errors or omissions resulted in either the withdrawal or substantial impairment of a potentially meritorious defense.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Costa

2. “[w]hen viewed as a whole, was the assistance provided to the defendant within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases?”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Costa

3. “`any error cause by individuals jurors considering different instances of culpable conduct for each count is probably harmless. '”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. PECPEC