Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Haw. 23 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 101 Wash. 2d 566 - State v. Petrich · State v. Arceo · State v. Pinero · Tachibana v. State · State v. Wallace

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) It is given by a person who is legally incompetent to authorize the conduct alleged; or (2) It is given by a person who by reason of youth, mental disease, disorder, or defect, or intoxication is manifestly unable or known by the defendant to be unable to make a reasonable judgment as to the nature or harmfulness of the conduct alleged; or (3) It is given by a person whose consent is sought to be prevented by the law defining the offense; or (4) It is induced by force, duress, or deception. The burden is upon the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the complaining witness did not consent to the conduct alleged or the result thereof. If the prosecution fails to meet its burden, then you must find the defendant not guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] person commits the offense of sexual assault in the first degree if: ... The person knowingly subjects another person to an act of sexual penetration by strong compulsion!.]” (Enumeration omitted.) HRS § 707-700 defines”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “absence of consent, or a threat, express or implied, that places a person in fear of public humiliation, property damage, or financial loss.” According to HRS § 707-700,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.