Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Idaho 752 - State v. Warden

State v. Warden’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2021

19 state decisions

70197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 23 Ill. 2d 306 - The PEOPLE v. Nettles · United States v. Holland · People v. Antista · Petty v. People · State v. Hunt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Upon an appeal from a conviction the function of the appellate court is to examine the record to determine if competent and substantial evidence exists to support the verdict. Where there is substantial and competent evidence to support the verdict such will not be disturbed.” State v. Warden, 97 Idaho 752, 754 , 554 P.2d 684, 686 (1976) (citations omitted).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[Tjhere was no showing that the defendant-appellant had actual possession of the substance nor is there any evidence whatsoever to support the inference merely because he was in a room where a controlled substance was later found that he is to be legitimately inferred .to have been in constructive possession. In the absence of such evidence to support the inference, the verdict here must be held to have been based on nothing but speculation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.