Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Idaho 93 - State v. Trowbridge

State v. Trowbridge’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2010

9 state decisions

4019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Cupp v. Naughten · Leary v. United States · Turner v. United States · Tot v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he unsatisfactorily explained possession of recently stolen property is a circumstance tending to infer knowledge of the unlawful character of the property, and that circumstance taken together with a necessary quantum of other incriminating evidence, may be used by the jury to reach a verdict, in light of their collective common experience, and the circumstances surrounding the case.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"However, you are never required to make this inference. It is the exclusive province of the jury to determine whether the facts and circumstances shown by the evidence in this case warrant any inference which the law permits the jury to draw from the possession of recently stolen property." 412 U.S. at 840 n. 3, 93 S.Ct. at 2360 n. 3.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Scienter is necessary for conviction of receiving stolen property mere possession of recently stolen property cannot give rise to a legal presumption of 'guilty' knowledge or belief .. ..”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.