Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 Ind. App. 388 - Albright v. Crim

97 Ind. App. 388 - Albright v. Crim’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
7
states following
November 1993
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 1993 · most notably Price v. State (1993), Clutter v. Blankenship (1940)

25 state decisions

801933194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Owen v. Phillips · Saier v. Joy · Higgins v. Bloch · Tureman v. Ketterlin · Jordan v. Nesmith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The inherent nature of an undertaking establishment is such that, if located in a residential district, it will inevitably create an atmosphere detrimental to the use and enjoyment of residence property, produce material annoyance and inconvenience to the occupants of adjacent dwellings, and render them physically uncomfortable, and in the absence of a strong showing of public necessity, its location in such a district should not be permitted over the protest of those who would be materially injured thereby. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . the depreciation in the value of the property shown and the constant depressing influence the maintenance of this undertaking establishment will have upon the appellees, and the resultant annoyance and discomfort, all tending to destroy their peace of mind and happiness, constitute an irreparable injury within the meaning of our law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.