Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 KAN 166 - Feichter v. Feichter

Feichter v. Feichter’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
November 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2019

6 state decisions

4019161920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Beuerman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it ought not to require very much of a showing of prejudice to authorize a new trial”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.