Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 KAN 33 - Stout v. Bowers

Stout v. Bowers’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
4
states following
November 1960
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 1960

16 state decisions

40191619201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Baldwin · Tefft v. Wilcox · Sly v. Powell · Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Ellis · Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Howell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence could not be sustained a verdict against her could not be directed, because of conflicting evidence subsequently produced in behalf of the defendants. Her case might have been strengthened by the testimony offered in their behalf, but on the motion to direct a verdict the prima jade case made by her testimony could not be weakened or destroyed by theirs.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.