Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 KAN 408 - Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald

Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
January 1983
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 1983

12 state decisions

4019161920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Foster Lumber Co. v. Harlan County Bank · Harrison v. Andrews · Charpie v. Stout · 13 Tex. Civ. App. 668 - Atwell v. Watkins · Bodwell v. M. Heaton & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This statute was not' complied with in any particular. Levying an attachment on the real estate in Sherman county did not impart notice of the attachment action in Russell county, although a copy of the attachment order may have been placed in a conspicuous place on the real estate.” (p.412.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.