Martin v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1916
Citation profile
2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1935
2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fitch v. Wetherbee · Leslie v. Gibson · County of Logan v. McKinley-Lanning Loan & Trust Co. · Ehrsam v. Smith · Commercial State Bank v. Ross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The bidder at a judicial sale may properly look to the language of the judgment under which it is made for reliable information as to what-he will get if his bid is accepted. The right to a deed and possession unless the property is redeemed within a year is quite a different -thing from a right to a deed and possession unless redemption is made within eighteen months.” (p. 725.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Marsh v. Votaw““If the trial court had treated Lewis’ request as a motion to modify the judgment, and upon a finding of inadvertence or irregularity had changed the period of redemption as there fixed, from twelve months to eighteen, its action in that regard would have been unassailable.” (p. 726.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Marsh v. Votaw
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.