Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 KAN 813 - Messick v. McEntire

Messick v. McEntire’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
April 1987
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Roberts v. Charles Wolff Packing Co. · McCracken v. Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co. · McCracken v. Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If it is proved that the injury to the workman results from his deliberate intention to cause such injury, or from his willful failure to use a guard or protection against accident required pursuant to any statute and provided for him, or a reasonable and proper guard and protection voluntarily furnished him by said employer, or solely from his deliberate breach of statutory regulations affecting safety of life or limb, or from his intoxication, any compensation in respect to that injury shall be disallowed.” (Gen. Stat. 1915, § 5896; Laws of 1917, ch. 226, § 27.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.