Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 KAN 89 - Anschutz v. Steinwand

Anschutz v. Steinwand’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
March 1936
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 1936

7 state decisions

40191619201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wyandotte State Bank v. Murray · Hemme v. School District No. 4 · Stetson v. Freeman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the present statute a sale may be set aside, although regularly made in accordance with law, upon equitable grounds. (Bank v. Murray, 84 Kan. 524 , 114 Pac. 847 .)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.