Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 97 MINN 385 - Howe v. Coates

Howe v. Coates’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
16
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently December 2012 · most notably Miller v. Snedeker (1960), Campbell v. Harsh (1912)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 33 state decisions — followed in 16 states

130190619101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. North River Sugar Refining Co. · Vought v. . Williams · Fleming v. . Burnham · Moore v. . Williams · 8 E.H. Smith 299 - Heller v. . Cohen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The contract called for an abstract showing good title, and nothing less than this would satisfy the condition, no matter what the vendor's real title might be.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.