Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

97 Miss. 806

State v. Clark

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1910

Mississippi Supreme Court · decided 1910-10-15

From the circuit court of Holmes county. Hon. J. M. Oashin, Judge. Clark, appellee, was indicted, under Code 1906, § 1331, for mingling poison with, whiskey with intent to kill or injure Mary Jane Clark. The appellee demurred to tbe indictment, and from a judgment sustaining the demurrer the state appealed to the supreme court.

Relies on Stanley v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1910-10-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1973

5 state decisions

201910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Anderson, J.,

¶1after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2The indictment is under section 1331, Code 1906, which is as follows: “Every person who shall mingle any poison with any food, drink, or medicine with intent to kill or injure any human being, or who shall wilfully poison any well, spring, or reservoir of water, shall, upon conviction, be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary not exceeding ten years, or in the county jail not exceeding one year, or by fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or both.” Where a statute makes it a crime to do one thing or another, and a person by one act does both of the forbidden things, he violates the statute but once, and there is only one penalty; and an indictment under such a statute may in a single count charge the defendant with doing both of the forbidden things, “employing the conjunction ‘and’ *810where the statute has 'or/ and it will not be double, and it will be established at the trial by proof of either one of them.” 1 Bishop, New Criminal Procedure (4th ed.) §§ 436, 586; Bishop on Statutory Crimes (3rd ed.) § 244.

¶3Under this statute it is not necessary foir the indictment to charge to whom the poison belonged, nor the food, drink, or medicine with which it is mingled, nor that it was in possession of the person for whom it was intended, nor that such person was about to or intended to drink the same. The corpus delicti consists in the mingling of the poison with the food, drink, or medicine. Stanley v. State, 82 Miss. 498, 34 South. 360. The indictment sufficiently charges the criminal purpose in mingling the poison and whiskey.

¶4Reversed and remanded.

/97/miss/806 · .json · Public domain